Consolidated Tomoka Makes First Tentative Moves Under New CEO

(CTO) announced two recently completed transactions, the first under the leadership of CEO .  The first transaction completed the repurchase of land that had been sold to Halifax Hospital Medical Center in 2003 but never developed.  The company entered into an agreement with Halifax in 2009 to repurchase 33 acres over 4 years, but purchased the final 17 acres a year early for $3,245,537 saving $75,000 by doing so.  The price paid represented the original sales price to Halifax, excluding the $75,000 discount.

At the same time, the company sold an 18,150 square foot building in Lakeland, FL that was formerly leased to Barnes & Noble for $2.9 million.  The building was carried at the original 2001 purchase price of $3.1265 million together with $471,500 in accumulated depreciation.  noted in the press release that the company intends to use the proceeds in a 1031 exchange purchase.  Given that, the property to be purchased must be identified by mid-February and must close in the first half of the year.

After several years of inactivity in a difficult market, it’s exciting to see the company begin to move to take advantage of opportunities. The advantage of the company’s strong balance sheet is that it can afford to wait out bad times and buy and sell from strength.

Disclosure: The author owns shares in

Eastman Kodak Preparing Bankruptcy Filing- WSJ

Kudos to the for scooping the story that Eastman (EK) is preparing a bankruptcy filing and may file by month’s end.  The company is still exploring a patent sale to stave off , but it will be difficult to get an adequate price in this distressed situation.  The company is said to be in negotiations for $1B in debtor-in-possession financing.  Kodak stock is down over 30% on the news- a stark reminder to those who have chastised us in recent days for picking on a beaten down stock that there is always more room to go down. will wipe out shareholders, but will provide an opportunity for the company to shed its liabilities and legacy costs, sell surplus assets in a controlled and organized way, and emerge with a profitable, but smaller operating business.  We believe the future for Kodak is bright, but current shareholders will not participate in its rebirth.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in

Eastman Kodak Delisting Notice a Non-Event

Lately, it seems like this blog is becoming all Eastman (EK) all the time.  Odd for a stock we don’t even own. Some Kodak bulls  have commented that we interpret every piece of Kodak news negatively, so we felt we should comment that today’s announcement that Kodak has received a continued listing standards notice from the is insignificant and should not factor into any appraisal of the company’s prospects.  There is nothing surprising about the notice; it merely states that the company’s average stock price has been below $1 for 30 consecutive trading days- something anyone with a calendar and internet access ought to have known.  It has no bearing and passes no judgement on the company’s prospects.

Kodak has 6 months to remedy the situation. By that point, either the stock will have rebounded above $1, or the company’s financial situation will be dire indeed.  We continue to think that is likely to file for this year- but this delisting notice has nothing to do with it.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in

Can Eastman Kodak’s Real Estate Save It?

A comment on a recent post asked whether we’d considered the value of Eastman ’s(EK) . It’s not something we’d given much thought to, but we’re friendly folk and so we proceeded to do a bit of digging.  Our first stop was Kodak’s most recent 10K. While some companies provide detail on their real estate holdings, Kodak provides a bare minimum. Kodak lists $1.037 billion in Property, Plant, and Equipment, $664 million in the United States, and $337 million abroad.  It’s reasonable to assume this long held property is held on Kodak’s books at a significant discount.  The most significant piece of real estate we were able to find is the 1200 acre Eastman Business Park in Rochester. The park has 300 greenfield acres resulting from the demolition of 44 buildings. There are still over 100 buildings remaining, and 14 have already been sold to other firms, including the largest, a 2.1 million square foot building sold for $11 million in 2008.

Kodak is also nearing a deal to sell some space to .  The college plans on spending $75 million to purchase and renovate the buildings.  Kodak’s real estate holdings are impressively large, and given the luxury of time the company could conceivably raise upwards of $2 billion by selling them, but it would be difficult to realize a fraction of that in the compressed time frame the company is working on. Similar to the patents, which I believe have been the subject of overly optimistic valuations, the real estate will take time to see its full value realized.  Any attempt to move the real estate quickly will result in lower sale prices. It’s possible that if the company can monetize some real estate and some intellectual property quickly, that can be staved off for the time being.  However, management will still be faced with a company bleeding money that they have not been able to staunch.

Please share any further information you have about Kodak’s real estate holdings so that we can continue to refine our valuation estimates.

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned.

Another Eastman Kodak Director Departs, Fleeing Sinking Ship

, who had been a Director at (EK) since 1997, resigned on December 29, the company reported in a filing with the SEC.  Tyson is the third director to resign in the last week, and, as with the previous two, ’s terse statement gave no reason or explanation.  We await the spin form the bulls, who no doubt will explain to us how the departure of three directors in one week is a positive sign for the struggling firm.

Disclosure: The author has no position in any stock mentioned

Response To Critic Of Our Eastman Kodak Post

Recently, we’ve taken a dim view of ’s(EK) prospects.  As we wrote here and here, we believe the company is most likely past the point where a turnaround outside of is possible. A commenter assuming various names, most recently “Truthseeker”, has expressed his criticism in a most disdainful and discourteous manner.  While we object strenuously to his lack of civility, and may delete future comments that do not take a civil tone(though we will never delete comments that merely disagree with us), we thought we would pull up  his comment and respond to it.  We encourage dissenting opinions and we all benefit from civil debate.

Truthseeker wrote:

Are you aware:

has received $1B offer in rescue financing from bondholders
Kodak has $2B+ in NOLs to offset income derived from patent sales
Kodak still has billions in non-core assets to sell if necessary to raise additional cash
Kodak has mentioned it can slow its global digital expansion if necessary to minimize cash burn

Didn’t think so..do some research before jumping on the bandwagon bashing a 70 cent stock  ..where were you when Kodak was trading $80 and when you could actually add some value? Pathetic.

Unlike in his previous comments, this time, Truthseeker actually stated some facts together with his offensive and discourteous tone.  Where I was when Kodak was at $80 is irrelevant; I wasn’t publicly advocating neither buying nor selling. I write infrequently and on topics that resonate with me at the moment. There’s still $.70 more for this to go down, and my initial post was reacting to an unwarranted jump in the share price. Where were you at $80?

As to your claims:
$1B offer in rescue financing from bondholders: bondholders have no reason to preserve value for equity holders, especially since it means keeping pension liabilities. Any bondholder bailout is likely to be part of a restructuring that wipes out equity holders
$2B in NOLs- you need to profit to take advantage and company’s liabilities are greater than $2B
Billions in non-core assets to sell: What are these magical assets that are worth billions, not core to the business and losing money right now? The patents again?
Slow global digital expansion to minimize cash burn: Kodak missed digital. Period. Expansion isn’t happening. What would it mean to slow it?

This company has a bloated legacy cost structure it can’t get out from other. Like other legacy manufacturing industries(auto, steel, etc.), it will require restructuring in bankruptcy to rationalize and create a sustainable business.

Disclosure: The author has no position in any stock mentioned

Map And Initial Analysis Of 79 Sears Closings Announced Today

Earlier this week, Holdings(SHLD) announced plans to shutter 100-120 stores. Today, the company released a pdf listing 79 stores to be closed, with more to be announced. I’ve converted this to a spreadsheet and mapped them

View Sears Holdings 12/29/2011 Closings in a full screen map

Of the stores closing 38 are Kmarts, and 14 are Sears Essentials/Grands, a failed concept which involved throwing a Sears sign on a former and hoping. This represents almost 30% of the remaining stores of this concept.  The closings announced seem to be concentrated in the southeast.  I haven’t had a chance yet to determine which stores are mall-based vs. freestanding, or to investigate ownership; if you have any information or analysis to add, please share it here.

KKR’s Representatives On Kodak’s Board Resign As Bankruptcy Looms

A little over two years ago, on September 29, 2009, Kolhberg, Kravis Roberts purchased $300 million in Senior Secured Notes from Eastman Kodak(EK) and was granted 40 million warrants at $5.50 per share.  As part of the investment,

The logo from 1987 to 2006. "Evolution of...

Image via Wikipedia

exercised its right to nominate two directors, Herald Chen and Adam Clammer.  Today, announced that Mr. Chen and Mr. Clammer had resigned.  In keeping with its exemplary corporate governance, the company released no information as to the cause of their departure. It would be safe to say, however, that KKR now feels that its interests have diverged from those of Kodak shareholders.  Perhaps it is a sign that a filing is imminent.

When we wrote about Kodak’s death rattles last week and wondered why the stock had popped(a gain which has now evaporated), we received some anonymous comments saying that we were foolish and knew nothing. This may well be so, but we’d like to think we’re educable. So if we’re missing something, if Kodak is really the next great stock, if it’s time for the return of the , make your case.  We’re happy to give equal time. We’ll even throw it up as a post if it’s well written and courteous. But in the meantime, we have to reiterate- this dead cat ain’t gonna bounce.

Disclosure: Author has no position in any stock mentioned

 

Softer And Softer Side Of Sears Holdings

It looks like has lost another round in his great experiment with retail. Neither of the two major brands that comprise Holdings(SHLD) were in good shape when he purchased them. He famously purchased in

English: Sears Essentials Store

, buying debt for pennies on the dollar and emerging from with a controlling stake(despite the small distraction of being kidnapped amid negotiations). We’d previously posted that Sears strategy of drift needed to end and about some signs we saw of a new strategy taking hold under new CEO Lou D’Ambrosio.  Today, Sears announced dismal holiday sales and the closing of 3% of its full-line stores.

Despite gimmicks like extended pre-Christmas hours, the company’s same-store sales were down 5.2%(4.4% at Kmart and 6% at Sears). Much of the decline came from sales of consumer electronics, which were weak in both chains. One bright spot was that Land’s End sales were up year over year.  The company now projects that Adjusted EBITDA for the 4th quarter, will be less than half of last year’s dismal $933 million.  Actual earnings will be far worse, driven by a non-cash charge of between $1.6 and $2.4 billion related to change in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets(you need to make money to use deferred tax assets), and impairment of goodwill.

Most significantly, the company will be closing 100-120 full line stores. The specific stores have not been announced, but the closings will generate $140 to $170 million in cash as inventory is sold, before any cash received from monetizing the underlying . The company will reduce peak inventory on top of that by $300 million and reduce fixed costs by $100 to $200 million. In total the company expects that the actions will reduce peak borrowing next year by $300 to $350 million.

Mr.D’Ambrosio described a change in the company’s strategy  regarding marginally performing stores:

In addition to the specific store closures listed above, we will carefully evaluate store performance going forward and act opportunistically to recognize value from poor performing stores as circumstances allow.  While our past practice has been to keep marginally performing stores open while we worked to improve their performance, we no longer believe that to be the appropriate action in this environment.  We intend to accentuate our focus and resources to our better performing stores with the goal of converting their customer experience into a world-class integrated retail experience.

Hopefully, it’s not too little, too late for Sears, as Jeanine Poggi at TheStreet.com reports that suppliers will pull back on extending credit to the retailer.  Sears itself has finally become concerned with liquidity, as the company notes that no shares were repurchased this quarter, ending quarter after quarter of plowing cash flow into aggressive buybacks. Interestingly, or, perhaps ominously, the company did not comment on either its online business or early results of licensing its brands for sale at other retailers.

We hope that these closings mark the first step in an aggressive pruning of money-losing operations. If online, brand licensing, and franchises can continue to grow at higher margins, and hidden gems like home services can be more fully exploited, we think the company can still return meaningful profits for shareholders.  The company may want to pursue additional spinoffs(perhaps of Land’s End or ) following the Orchard Supply spinoff. In any event, as long as the company can control the liquidation of its assets over a long period of time, shareholders will benefit, but the company is indeed walking a fine line and may soon cross into the point of no return.

At the open this morning, Sears is trading down 19% to $37

Disclosure: The author owns shares in

 

 

 

Eastman Kodak Divests Insignificant Division, Muddles Management Structure, Stock Jumps 20%

Eastman (EK) was once synonymous with photography and imaging. Today, like the abandoned subwayin its home town of Rochester, it stands as a hulking relic testifying to the lost hopes and dreams of a bygone era.  Kodak’s

The logo from 1987 to 2006. "Evolution of...

moments are now but a series of shadowy images of past glory wafting away.  This afternoon, the company issued two press releases.  The first, announcing an agreement to sell Eastman Gelatine for an undisclosed amount, stated that it was

consistent with its previously announced intention to sell non-core assets to sharpen the Company’s focus on its digital growth initiatives and accelerate Kodak’s transformation to a digital company

It’s a good thing the visionaries at Kodak have recognized the future is digital and have decided to sharpen their digital focus and accelerate their transition to digital. If only it were 1995! The company sold a minor division with just 95 employees for an amount it chose not to disclose, nor did it disclose any details about the division’s revenue nor profitability. In short, this is an immaterial event that has little impact on Kodak’s fight to remain solvent.

The second announcement, which was quite brief, noted the election of , currently General Counsel, as President.  What about , the current President? No problem, he’s also President. No doubt Kodak noted how effective it has been for (RIMM) to have co-CEOs and decided to emulate that company’s stunning success.  CEO Antonio Perez noted that the move reflected the strategic importance of the company’s intellectual property.  Kodak has 3 towering legacies: a brand synonymous with photography, a wealth of patents covering imaging technologies, and a crippling pension obligation.  The company invented much of modern imaging yet was slow to transition to the new world and gave up leadership to others. The market holds out hope regarding the value of patents and today’s 20% jump after hours is clearly a reaction to Ms. Quatela’s appointment as President.  Even in this act, the company has proved tentative, keeping Mr. Faraci in place.  This lack of decisiveness and vision led to the company’s spiral downwards, and it may eliminate any chance the once-great company has of voiding .

Disclosure: The author holds no position in any stock mentioned