<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Requiem For A Dear Friend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2007/05/09/requiem-for-a-dear-friend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2007/05/09/requiem-for-a-dear-friend/</link>
	<description>Something of Value</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2007/05/09/requiem-for-a-dear-friend/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2007/05/09/requiem-for-a-dear-friend/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Sorry, here is the link:

&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2007/db20070502_172359_page_2.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Smoking Out Suitors for Dow Jones&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, here is the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2007/db20070502_172359_page_2.htm" rel="nofollow">Smoking Out Suitors for Dow Jones</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2007/05/09/requiem-for-a-dear-friend/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2007/05/09/requiem-for-a-dear-friend/#comment-347</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2007/db20070502_172359_page_2.htm" title="Smoking Out Suitors for Dow Jones" rel="nofollow"&gt;

The link from BusinessWeek above is another example of inaccuracies in published articles. This story was published right after Murdoch's bid.

It cites that News Corp. "...has a market cap of $23 billion." Nowhere near its actual $70 billion value.

"Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Blackstone are trying to take control of Clear Channel (CCU)." I believe it is Thomas H. Lee Partners and Bain Capital. I don't understand how these can be published without the facts being checked - and without any corrections being posted.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/may2007/db20070502_172359_page_2.htm" title="Smoking Out Suitors for Dow Jones" rel="nofollow"></p>
<p>The link from BusinessWeek above is another example of inaccuracies in published articles. This story was published right after Murdoch&#8217;s bid.</p>
<p>It cites that News Corp. &#8220;&#8230;has a market cap of $23 billion.&#8221; Nowhere near its actual $70 billion value.</p>
<p>&#8220;Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Blackstone are trying to take control of Clear Channel (CCU).&#8221; I believe it is Thomas H. Lee Partners and Bain Capital. I don&#8217;t understand how these can be published without the facts being checked - and without any corrections being posted.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
