<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not the only Inelegant Investor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/</link>
	<description>Something of Value</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 05:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I understand. One of the many differences between stocks and lingerie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand. One of the many differences between stocks and lingerie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: investor</title>
		<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Don-
  You&#039;re right of course. I merely meant I don&#039;t need to worry whether something is &quot;sexy&quot; before I buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don-<br />
  You&#8217;re right of course. I merely meant I don&#8217;t need to worry whether something is &#8220;sexy&#8221; before I buy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 05:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.inelegantinvestor.com/2006/11/09/not-the-only-inelegant-investor/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Honestly Im not sure I understand you correctly but I would tend to disagree. With no clients to please it should free you up for to occasionally chase those short term thrills. Going back to Grantham&#039;s example - if it is your portfolio you know the loss is the same 50% despite the names of the stocks. In fact it is often those type of stocks that can yield what Jim Cramer (yes yes Cramer) calls the &#039;home runs&#039;. Avoiding those can really leave a lot of money on the table. Thats my opinion - pursue any opportunity to make $$$ Short term or long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly Im not sure I understand you correctly but I would tend to disagree. With no clients to please it should free you up for to occasionally chase those short term thrills. Going back to Grantham&#8217;s example &#8211; if it is your portfolio you know the loss is the same 50% despite the names of the stocks. In fact it is often those type of stocks that can yield what Jim Cramer (yes yes Cramer) calls the &#8216;home runs&#8217;. Avoiding those can really leave a lot of money on the table. Thats my opinion &#8211; pursue any opportunity to make $$$ Short term or long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

